<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bridget Magnus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bridgetmagnus.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:51:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Figures for 8/27/2010 by Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/27/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/27/friday-figures-for-8272010/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/27/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=840#comment-910</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/27/2010      Tags: 4885-non-distressed, available-or-contingent, Bank Owned, considered-at-risk, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/27/2010      Tags: 4885-non-distressed, available-or-contingent, Bank Owned, considered-at-risk, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed Signals from HUD Housing Policy Conference by Bridget Magnus</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/17/mixed-signals-from-hud-housing-policy-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=827#comment-897</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very interesting idea, Steve!  Thanks for sharing.

I always personally thought that the TARP funds would have been better spent paying down $100k on each first mortgage in the United States: it would have cost less, prevented millions of short sales and foreclosures, allowed millions more refinancings, and the banks would have gotten the liquidity we were told at the time they had to have *or else!*. Not that it would have been a good idea, but it was a better idea than just handing the banks the blank check they actually got!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very interesting idea, Steve!  Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>I always personally thought that the TARP funds would have been better spent paying down $100k on each first mortgage in the United States: it would have cost less, prevented millions of short sales and foreclosures, allowed millions more refinancings, and the banks would have gotten the liquidity we were told at the time they had to have *or else!*. Not that it would have been a good idea, but it was a better idea than just handing the banks the blank check they actually got!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed Signals from HUD Housing Policy Conference by Steve Cox</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/17/mixed-signals-from-hud-housing-policy-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=827#comment-896</guid>
		<description>No cost housing stimulus - solution to the foreclosure crisis

Because of negative equity most underwater homeowners can&#039;t sell their homes and they can&#039;t refinance. Bankruptcy and/or default is not an option for most homeowners. Especially for homeowners that feel a moral obligation to meet their financial commitments. The unjustness of this predicament extends to all homeowners because about 15 million potential homebuyers are locked-out of a housing market that desperately needs more buyers.

From the mortgage/banking industry perspective; their survival is hinged on the hope that the underwater homeowners will continue to embrace their moral, social, and ethical values in spite of the financial hopelessness of their long term situation.

Until this quagmire is resolved our housing market will continue to suffer because the seller/buyer ratio is drastically unbalanced. Additionally, the number of bank owned properties are increasing which is also forcing serious downward pressure on home values.

Here&#039;s the solution: &quot;Equity Warrants&quot;. 

The underwater homeowner could issue an Equity Warrant to cover their negative equity thereby allowing the homeowner to sell their home even though the proceeds may not be sufficient to completely pay-off the mortgage.

This Equity Warrant would grant rights to the borrower’s future equity in any home they own. When, and if, the borrower&#039;s future equity equals the amount of the warrant, the lender would have the right to convert the warrant to a note secured by the home owner’s real equity.

The downside to the borrower is that someday the warrant will be converted to a note that will require interest and payments. The downside to the mortgage holder is that they will not receive full payoffs for existing loans. The upside to the mortgage/banking industry--and our economy--would be a substantial reduction in the number of foreclosures.

However, to soften the impact to the mortgage holder, the warrants could be sold by the mortgage holders. As an ironic twist, instead of trading Credit Default Swaps, Wall Street could trade Equity Warrants.

This system would create millions of potential homebuyers, thereby improving our housing market and home values. Additionally, the underwater homeowners would have a respectable alternative to short-sells and defaults.

What would it take to make this happen? This system would need an act of congress to enact laws requiring mortgage holders to accept Equity Warrants from underwater homeowners.

For example scenarios go here: http://www.upostlive.com/eWarrants.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No cost housing stimulus &#8211; solution to the foreclosure crisis</p>
<p>Because of negative equity most underwater homeowners can&#8217;t sell their homes and they can&#8217;t refinance. Bankruptcy and/or default is not an option for most homeowners. Especially for homeowners that feel a moral obligation to meet their financial commitments. The unjustness of this predicament extends to all homeowners because about 15 million potential homebuyers are locked-out of a housing market that desperately needs more buyers.</p>
<p>From the mortgage/banking industry perspective; their survival is hinged on the hope that the underwater homeowners will continue to embrace their moral, social, and ethical values in spite of the financial hopelessness of their long term situation.</p>
<p>Until this quagmire is resolved our housing market will continue to suffer because the seller/buyer ratio is drastically unbalanced. Additionally, the number of bank owned properties are increasing which is also forcing serious downward pressure on home values.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the solution: &#8220;Equity Warrants&#8221;. </p>
<p>The underwater homeowner could issue an Equity Warrant to cover their negative equity thereby allowing the homeowner to sell their home even though the proceeds may not be sufficient to completely pay-off the mortgage.</p>
<p>This Equity Warrant would grant rights to the borrower’s future equity in any home they own. When, and if, the borrower&#8217;s future equity equals the amount of the warrant, the lender would have the right to convert the warrant to a note secured by the home owner’s real equity.</p>
<p>The downside to the borrower is that someday the warrant will be converted to a note that will require interest and payments. The downside to the mortgage holder is that they will not receive full payoffs for existing loans. The upside to the mortgage/banking industry&#8211;and our economy&#8211;would be a substantial reduction in the number of foreclosures.</p>
<p>However, to soften the impact to the mortgage holder, the warrants could be sold by the mortgage holders. As an ironic twist, instead of trading Credit Default Swaps, Wall Street could trade Equity Warrants.</p>
<p>This system would create millions of potential homebuyers, thereby improving our housing market and home values. Additionally, the underwater homeowners would have a respectable alternative to short-sells and defaults.</p>
<p>What would it take to make this happen? This system would need an act of congress to enact laws requiring mortgage holders to accept Equity Warrants from underwater homeowners.</p>
<p>For example scenarios go here: <a href="http://www.upostlive.com/eWarrants.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.upostlive.com/eWarrants.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Figures for 8/13/2010 by Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/13/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/13/friday-figures-for-8132010/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/13/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=823#comment-894</guid>
		<description>[...] posted here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/13/2010      Tags: 6254-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 8/13/2010      Tags: 6254-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still #1, Not in a Good Way by Tweets that mention Bridget Magnus » Still #1, Not in a Good Way -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/12/still-1-not-in-a-good-way/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bridget Magnus » Still #1, Not in a Good Way -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=821#comment-893</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bridget Magnus, Michael W. Hudson. Michael W. Hudson said: RT @bmagnus: #Nevada&#039;s still #1, but not in a good way #foreclosure #lvre http://bit.ly/cuLscZ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bridget Magnus, Michael W. Hudson. Michael W. Hudson said: RT @bmagnus: #Nevada&#039;s still #1, but not in a good way #foreclosure #lvre <a href="http://bit.ly/cuLscZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cuLscZ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Figues for 8/6/2010 by Bridget Magnus » Friday Figues for 8/6/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/08/06/friday-figues-for-862010/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » Friday Figues for 8/6/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=818#comment-885</guid>
		<description>[...] the article here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figues for 8/6/2010      Tags: 6025-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the article here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figues for 8/6/2010      Tags: 6025-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Figures for 7/30/2010 by Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/30/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/07/30/friday-figures-for-7302010/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/30/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=812#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] posted here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/30/2010      Tags: 5797-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/30/2010      Tags: 5797-short, available-listings, median-price, properties, short sales, short-sale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting Excuse for Ignoring Fair Housing Law by Rachelle Anselmi</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/07/20/interesting-excuse-for-ignoring-fair-housing-law/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachelle Anselmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=804#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Familial Status and Fair Housing Laws are not to be taken lightly... I can see why the loan officer decided to proceed with the loan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Familial Status and Fair Housing Laws are not to be taken lightly&#8230; I can see why the loan officer decided to proceed with the loan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday Figures for 7/2/2010 by Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/2/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/07/02/friday-figures-for-722010/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/2/2010 &#124; Real Estate Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=790#comment-858</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/2/2010      Tags: 4468-non-distressed, available-or-contingent, Bank Owned, considered-at-risk, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: Bridget Magnus » Friday Figures for 7/2/2010      Tags: 4468-non-distressed, available-or-contingent, Bank Owned, considered-at-risk, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Few Facts about FHA Loans by Bridget Magnus » A Few Facts about FHA Loans &#124; CreditGuru.Biz</title>
		<link>http://bridgetmagnus.com/2010/07/01/a-few-facts-about-fha-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Magnus » A Few Facts about FHA Loans &#124; CreditGuru.Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgetmagnus.com/?p=788#comment-854</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original post: Bridget Magnus » A Few Facts about FHA Loans [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original post: Bridget Magnus » A Few Facts about FHA Loans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
